Bondage Demons
|
|
Head Cage |
|
INSPIRATION
|
![]() |
|
|
|
||
|
DEVELOPMENT & FABRICATION
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
||
![]() |
The second design provides a large round opening at mouth level for obvious reasons. Rather than rely on a hinged opening, the front and back portions are positioned about the head and fastened in place with locked tabs. When not on the wearer's head it can thus be transported more efficiently. Different combinations of front and back coupled together. |
|
| With both designs, wearers tend to look sad. A highly desirable outcome. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Another design feature added to the second unit was placement of attachment points so that the wearer can be lead around or tethered to various objects. This also allows for the implementation of various predicament situations. | |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
APPLICATION & TESTING
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
A notable exception is in the facilitation of cock sucking. The second model is acceptable as far as this capability goes. The hole for cock access is large enough, positioned correctly. The head cage encompasses the head tightly enough so as to allow deep penetration. But improvements can be made. The upper band which encloses the face makes contact with the nose when the subject's mouth is opened wide causing some discomfort for the wearer, and limiting how wide the mouth can be opened. An additional model will be constructed to eliminate this inconvenience. |
|
|
FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
|
|